The Financial Markets Authority has recently called out KiwiSaver scheme managers for not being transparent with their annual fees to savers. The FMA released a guidance to KiwiSaver schemes so they can prove that they are not charging high-priced fees which is against the KiwiSaver laws and regulations.
Some KiwiSaver managers expressed their concern, stating that FMA's intervention on fees and value for money was unnecessary as it would backlash and the market would punish poor value, but according to Paul Gregory, the long-term nature of most investing may result in Kiwis being punished for a longer time.
If providers fail to conduct the annual fee reviews, they may face consequences from FMA, including a "stop order" which will prohibit the scheme from advertising or a "direction order" which means they will be ordered to carry out specific rules. They may also prevent a scheme from taking on new members or take it to court if proven that they’re charging unreasonable KiwiSaver fees.
The FMA's guidance dictates that fee reviews should focus on the following:
The purpose of this guidance is to help managers and supervisors of KiwiSaver schemes on how they can demonstrate how they are following these obligations. That said, Paul Gregory, FMA investment management director, advises KiwiSaver Scheme providers to give value money reports yearly. This approach will help schemes identify what they need to improve on their products, especially when it comes to value for money. This will help schemes to justify and differentiate from other schemes their fees and the value for money they provide.
Overall, the main goal of this initiative is to provide better transparency and help savers make more informed decisions in terms of which schemes to put their money into.
The reviews must be based on four key principles, which will be applied when assessing reviews conducted by FMA or KiwiSaver schemes managers and their supervisors.
1. Risk and return are critical
The value for money for members depends highly on how well the manager's process and competence minimize the investment risk that members experience, and members' return after fees. If the manager fails to do this over a long period of time, supervisors will assess whether the manager has sufficient investment risk management competence to execute their chosen strategy.
|2. The financial value of investment management must be shared||
This principle gives importance to the member of the net return and how much of the return available to the member is taken by the manager in fees when compared to the return before fees. That said, the member's share of the financial value of the investment must be appropriate for the risk they're taking as well as the cost they have paid. Note that what is deemed appropriate will depend on several factors.
|3. Advice and service is received, not just offered||
This principle gives importance to the a service or feature provided by a manager to the member's value for for money if it benefits the member directly, especially when it comes to decision making, or it benefits the members' account such as reducing investment risk or increasing return.
|4. Review yourself as you review others||
Managers must have a clear understanding of its cost base and evaluate their fees and value for money to members the way they would evaluate themselves.
Narrow down your options when it comes to choosing a KiwiSaver fund! Use a comparison tool that will give you customized recommendations based on your needs and how much you want to risk, all in just a few minutes!
Fuel prices in NZ are currently at a record high. Here are some effective tips on how to save money on your next drive.
YouTube and TikTok are the most popular sources of financial education and literacy among Gen Z. Here's our list of the best pe...
Sign up didn't go quite the way it was meant to. But Kate called and she walked through everything so we could work out what went wrong. she was patient, friendly, supportive and kept me calm to finally get plan registration sorted ( still can't log in though - she must be magic )
Found it really easy to find what i needed and also got a call regarding what deals might be best suited etc. Saves a lot of time. Highly reccommend glimp
Easy site to navigate. Gave me great options that suit my household including reputable providers I wasn't familiar with.
I’ve just had a great experience with Kurt from glimp compare. He helped me through the process from the time I clicked onto the website, via the chat function. Long story short I have signed up to a new power and broadband provider with significant cost savings. There was no pressure at any stage, just respectful guidance and facilitation to initiate the new supply.
Good options, but ideally an option to combine & compare cost for best mobile + broadband option would be nice.